O repositorio dixital RUNA

    • Español
    • Galego
    • English
  • Galego 
    • Español
    • Galego
    • English
  • Login
RUNABibliosaúdeXunta de galicia. Consellería de sanidadeServicio Galego de saúde
  • REPOSITORIO
  • SOBRE NÓS
    • Sobre RUNA
    • Normativa
    • Política Sergas
  • AXUDA
    • Axuda
    • FAQ
  •   RUNA Principal
  • Publicación científica
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Rapid diagnostic referral for colorectal cancer in Pontevedra

Pérez Cachafeiro, Santiago; Esperon Güimil, José Antonio; MARTINEZ PILLADO, MODESTO; Ayude Diaz, Sandra María; Otero Leiro, Noa
Thumbnail
Estatísticas
Estatísticas
Ver Estatísticas de uso
Identificadores
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11940/10322
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4574.4887
Rexistro completo
Servizos
Servizos
RISMendeleyLinksolver
Visualización ou descarga de ficheiros
Visualización ou descarga de ficheiros
comunicacion (45.91Kb)
Data de publicación
2016-06-15
Tipo de contido
Publicación de congreso
DeCS
médicos de atención primaria | neoplasias del colon | autorremisión del médico | equipo de respuesta rápida en hospitales | neoplasias colorrectales
MeSH
Hospital Rapid Response Team | Physician Self-Referral | Physicians, Primary Care | Colonic Neoplasms | Colorectal Neoplasms
CIE
CAPÍTULO II Tumores [neoplasias] (C00-D48)
Resumo
Background and Aim: Recently, a rapid diagnostic referral (RDR) process based on clinical criteria was implemented in our area for both Primary Care Physicians and Hospital Doctors. The aim was to shorten the interval between diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer to less than 30 days. We audit this process in order to assess its real usefulness. Method: We conducted a retrospective audit of the RDR during the last trimester of 2015. We recorded the criteria of the referral, as well as dates of consultation, endoscopy, discussion of cases at our Cancer Committee and beginning of treatment. Results: 2 out of 31 patients (6.45%) that went into the RDR process had a real colorectal cancer, both included in the RDR by their Family Physicians (2 out of 17, 11.76%). While in-hospital referrals included cases without clinical criteria, Primary Care referrals did adjust to them. The main criteria was abnormal bleeding or blood in stool sample (38.71%). The median delay to consultation was 6 days (IQR 5-12), to endoscopy was 7 days (IQR 5-36), the discussion at the Committee was always the day following the endoscopic diagnosis. And the treatment of both cases began the second day after the diagnosis (one underwent surgery and the other received chemotherapy). Conclusions: Although there is still room to improve our RDR process, it reduces the time to treatment in cases with high suspicious. It is clear from the results that the usefulness of this pathway is focused on the referrals from our Primary Care level, since in-Hospital referrals seem to use the RDR with other purposes

Navega

Todo RUNAColecciónsCentrosAutoresTítulosDeCSMeSHCIETipo de contidoEsta colecciónCentrosAutoresTítulosDeCSMeSHCIETipo de contido

Estatísticas

Ver Estatísticas de uso

DE INTERESE

Sobre Acceso AbertoDereitos de autor
TwitterRSS
Xunta de Galicia
© Xunta de Galicia. Información mantida e publicada na internet pola Consellería de Sanidade o Servizo Galego de Saúde
Aviso legal | RSS
Galicia