Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPalomar-Llatas, Federico
dc.contributor.authorArantón Areosa, Luis 
dc.contributor.authorRumbo Prieto, Jose María 
dc.contributor.authorFornés-Pujalte, Begoña
dc.contributor.authorCastellano-Rioja, Elena
dc.contributor.authorPerish-Caballero, Joan Ernest
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-03T07:32:57Z
dc.date.available2018-12-03T07:32:57Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-03
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/317169986es
dc.identifier.otherhttp://program.m-anage.com/ProgramSearch/Program?eventname=ewma2017&language=en-GB&searchstring=Dermatological%20nursing&programid=49543&pProgramGrade=Alles
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11940/11243
dc.description.abstractObjective: to evaluate the editorial independence and declaration of conflicts of interest expressed in the Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) on prevention and treatment of ulcers and chronic wounds. Methodology: systematic review of current national and international GPCs on vascular leg ulcers (VLU), diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), pressure ulcers (PU) and malignant ulcers (MU). Evaluation Domain 6 (item # 22 and # 23) AGREE II Instrument (Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation). Review by 6 experts and intra-observer analysis. Results: 26 CPGs were analyzed (12 on PU, 7 on DFU, 6 on VLU and 1 on MU). 80.7% of CPGs were international publications. 10 CPG fully complied with the Dominion 6 AGREE II, 13 did so partially, and 3 not comply. Relating to item 22 (editorial independence), the average value achieved was 62.5%, while for item 23 (conflicts of interest) an 83.92% was obtained. Conclusions: 73% of CPGs comply successfully the Domain 6 AGREE II; Still, GPC-UVP should raise their standard of editorial quality. The item 22 (editorial independence) was the least fulfilled and the most difficult to assess by reviewers, it must be a section to improve in future editions of CPGs. Keywords: clinical practice guidelines, editorial independence, conflict of interest, ethics, AGREE, ulcers.es
dc.description.abstractComunicación - póster presentada en: 27th Conference of the European Wound Management Association (EWMA 2017) in cooperation with WCS Knowledge Centre Wound Care: "Change, opportunities and challenges - Wound management in changing healthcare systems" celebrado en Amsterdam (The Neatherlands), el 3 y 5 de Mayo 2017.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.subject.meshEditorial*
dc.subject.meshEvaluation Studies as Topic*
dc.subject.meshPractice Guideline*
dc.titleEditorial independence and conflict of interest in clinical practice guidelines on care of ulcers and chronic woundses
dc.typePublicación de congresoes
dc.event.title27th Conference of the European Wound Management Association (EWMA)At: Amsterdam, The Netherlandses
dc.organizationServizo Galego de Saúde::Estrutura de Xestión Integrada (EOXI)::EOXI de Ferrol – Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol::Enfermeríaes
dc.place.realizationAmsterdames
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.subject.decseditorial*
dc.subject.decsestudios de evaluación como asunto*
dc.subject.decsguía de práctica clínica*
dc.subject.keywordconflictos de interéses
dc.subject.keywordindependencia editoriales
dc.subject.keywordguías de práctica clínicaes


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record