RUNA digital repository

    • Español
    • Galego
    • English
  • English 
    • Español
    • Galego
    • English
  • Login
RUNABibliosaúdeXunta de galicia. Consellería de sanidadeServicio Galego de saúde
  • REPOSITORY
  • ABOUT US
    • About RUNA
    • Normative
    • Sergas Policy
  • HELP
    • Help
    • FAQ
  •   RUNA Home
  • Scientific publication
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Dental implants placed on bone subjected to vertical alveolar distraction show the same performance as those placed on primitive bone

Pérez Sayáns, Mario; León-Camacho, M. L. A.; Somoza-Martín, J. M.; Fernández-González, B.; Blanes-Vázquez-Gundín, S.; Gándara-Rey, J. M.; García García, Abel
Thumbnail
Statistics
Statistics
View Usage Statistics
Identifiers
Identifiers
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11940/3694
PMID: 23524476
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.18545
ISSN: 1698-4447
Full record
Services
Services
RISMendeleyLinksolver
Files view or download
Files view or download
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal . 2013 Jul 1;18(4):e686-92 (975.1Kb)
Date issued
2013
Journal title
Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal
Type of content
Artigo
MeSH
Adult | Aged | Alveolar Process | Bone Resorption | Dental Implants | Female | Follow-Up Studies | Humans | Male | Middle Aged | Osteogenesis, Distraction
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Vertical osteogenic alveolar distraction (VOAD) allows for the augmentation of the alveolar ridge for the placement of dental implants in atrophic alveolar ridges. The goal of this paper is to assess long-term peri-implant bone resorption in implants placed on bones subjected to VOAD, comparing it with a group of patients who had implants placed directly on the alveolar bone without previous bone regeneration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a follow-up study on 32 patients who were divided into two groups: The Distraction Group (14 patients), and the Distraction-Free Group (18 patients), who received a total of 100 implants. Peri-implant bone loss was measured by means of panoramic X-rays, at the time of loading and one year later, and in 35 implants of each group after 3 years of functional loading. RESULTS: The peri-implant bone resorption (PBR) average observed in the Distraction Group at the time of prosthetic placement is higher (0.50 +/- 0.09 mm) than in the Distraction-Free Group (0.25 +/- 0.06 mm), showing statistically significant results (p=0.047). PBR levels 1 year after loading were the same for both groups (0.66 mm). At 3 years, they were higher in the Distraction Group (1.03 +/- 0.22 mm vs. 0.68 +/- 0.08 mm).

Browse

All of RUNACollectionsCentersAuthorsTitlesDeCSMeSHCIETypes of contentThis CollectionCentersAuthorsTitlesDeCSMeSHCIETypes of content

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

OF INTEREST

About Open AccessCopyright
TwitterRSS
Xunta de Galicia
© Xunta de Galicia. Información mantida e publicada na internet pola Consellería de Sanidade o Servizo Galego de Saúde
Legal warning | RSS
Galicia