O repositorio dixital RUNA

    • Español
    • Galego
    • English
  • Galego 
    • Español
    • Galego
    • English
  • Login
RUNABibliosaúdeXunta de galicia. Consellería de sanidadeServicio Galego de saúde
  • REPOSITORIO
  • SOBRE NÓS
    • Sobre RUNA
    • Normativa
    • Política Sergas
  • AXUDA
    • Axuda
    • FAQ
  •   RUNA Principal
  • Publicación científica
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Dental implants placed on bone subjected to vertical alveolar distraction show the same performance as those placed on primitive bone

Pérez Sayáns, Mario; León-Camacho, M. L. A.; Somoza-Martín, J. M.; Fernández-González, B.; Blanes-Vázquez-Gundín, S.; Gándara-Rey, J. M.; García García, Abel
Thumbnail
Estatísticas
Estatísticas
Ver Estatísticas de uso
Identificadores
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11940/3694
PMID: 23524476
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.18545
ISSN: 1698-4447
Rexistro completo
Servizos
Servizos
RISMendeleyLinksolver
Visualización ou descarga de ficheiros
Visualización ou descarga de ficheiros
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal . 2013 Jul 1;18(4):e686-92 (975.1Kb)
Data de publicación
2013
Título da revista
Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal
Tipo de contido
Artigo
MeSH
Adult | Aged | Alveolar Process | Bone Resorption | Dental Implants | Female | Follow-Up Studies | Humans | Male | Middle Aged | Osteogenesis, Distraction
Resumo
INTRODUCTION: Vertical osteogenic alveolar distraction (VOAD) allows for the augmentation of the alveolar ridge for the placement of dental implants in atrophic alveolar ridges. The goal of this paper is to assess long-term peri-implant bone resorption in implants placed on bones subjected to VOAD, comparing it with a group of patients who had implants placed directly on the alveolar bone without previous bone regeneration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a follow-up study on 32 patients who were divided into two groups: The Distraction Group (14 patients), and the Distraction-Free Group (18 patients), who received a total of 100 implants. Peri-implant bone loss was measured by means of panoramic X-rays, at the time of loading and one year later, and in 35 implants of each group after 3 years of functional loading. RESULTS: The peri-implant bone resorption (PBR) average observed in the Distraction Group at the time of prosthetic placement is higher (0.50 +/- 0.09 mm) than in the Distraction-Free Group (0.25 +/- 0.06 mm), showing statistically significant results (p=0.047). PBR levels 1 year after loading were the same for both groups (0.66 mm). At 3 years, they were higher in the Distraction Group (1.03 +/- 0.22 mm vs. 0.68 +/- 0.08 mm).

Navega

Todo RUNAColecciónsCentrosAutoresTítulosDeCSMeSHCIETipo de contidoEsta colecciónCentrosAutoresTítulosDeCSMeSHCIETipo de contido

Estatísticas

Ver Estatísticas de uso

DE INTERESE

Sobre Acceso AbertoDereitos de autor
TwitterRSS
Xunta de Galicia
© Xunta de Galicia. Información mantida e publicada na internet pola Consellería de Sanidade o Servizo Galego de Saúde
Aviso legal | RSS
Galicia