Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCalvo Henríquez, Christian Ezequiel*
dc.contributor.authorRuedaFernandez-Rueda, M.*
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Lliberos, A.*
dc.contributor.authorMaldonado Alvarado, Byron Felipe*
dc.contributor.authorMota Rojas, Xenia Iraisa*
dc.contributor.authorManiaci, A.*
dc.contributor.authorIannella, G.*
dc.contributor.authorJimenez-Huerta, I.*
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-08T12:16:22Z
dc.date.available2025-09-08T12:16:22Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationCalvo-Henriquez C, RuedaFernandez-Rueda M, Garcia-Lliberos A, Maldonado-Alvarado B, Mota-Rojas X, Maniaci A, et al. Coblator adenoidectomy in pediatric patients: a state-of-the-art review. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH; 2023;280(10):4339-49.
dc.identifier.issn1434-4726
dc.identifier.otherhttps://portalcientifico.sergas.gal//documentos/64ce9d7244bb53692abd3544
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11940/21238
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Adenoid hypertrophy is one of the main causes of nasal obstruction in 'children. Adenoid hypertrophy can be approached either with nasal corticosteroids, or surgically when medical treatment fails. Different adenoidectomy techniques have been proposed to reduce morbidity and surgical risks, with a consequent marked increase in the use of new surgical procedures in recent years, with a progressive increase in the use of coblation. This state-of-the-art review aims to systematically review the current literature on the role of coblation in adenoidectomy. Methods: The selection criteria included children submitted to adenoidectomy with coblator vs other techniques. 11 research questions were defined. 4 databases were explored by four authors: PubMed (Medline), the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and SciELO. The level of evidence and quality of the selected articles were assessed according to assessed according to the Quality Assessment Checklist of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Results: 20 studies met the inclusion criteria: 2 metanalysis, 12 randomized clinical trial, 2 non-randomized clinical trial, 1 prospective cohort study, and 3 retrospective cohort study. It encompassed a total population of 8375 participants. Regarding the different surgical techniques, 18 studies (excluding metanalysis) performed coblation (n = 1550), 6 microdebridement (n = 883), 15 curettage (n = 4016), and 1 suction coagulation (n = 1926). Conclusion: Coblator adenoidectomy appears to offer better adenoid control compared to curettage, with a possible, although not confirmed lower rate of revision surgery. Similarly, this greater resection of adenoid tissue seems to be related to a greater reduction of nasal obstruction. The advantages of this technique are mainly less surgical bleeding-although it is not clear this is a clinically relevant difference, and less postoperative pain compared to cold curettage. The difference in pain is small, as adenoidectomy is not a painful surgery in general. There is little evidence on the control of OME and comparison with other techniques such as microdebrider adenoidectomy.
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. There is no financial support~Universidad Internacional de Andalucia provided economic support through its grant programme
dc.languageeng
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.meshChild *
dc.subject.meshHumans *
dc.subject.meshAdenoidectomy *
dc.subject.meshAdenoids *
dc.subject.meshHypertrophy *
dc.subject.meshNasal Obstruction *
dc.subject.meshPain, Postoperative *
dc.subject.meshProspective Studies *
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studies *
dc.subject.meshRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic *
dc.titleCoblator adenoidectomy in pediatric patients: a state-of-the-art review
dc.typeArtigo
dc.authorsophosCalvo-Henriquez, C.; RuedaFernandez-Rueda, M.; Garcia-Lliberos, A.; Maldonado-Alvarado, B.; Mota-Rojas, X.; Maniaci, A.; Iannella, G.; Jimenez-Huerta, I.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00405-023-08094-7
dc.identifier.sophos64ce9d7244bb53692abd3544
dc.issue.number10
dc.journal.titleEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology*
dc.organizationServizo Galego de Saúde::Áreas Sanitarias (A.S.) - Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago::Otorrinolaringoloxía
dc.organizationServizo Galego de Saúde::Áreas Sanitarias (A.S.) - Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago::Otorrinolaringoloxía
dc.organizationServizo Galego de Saúde::Áreas Sanitarias (A.S.) - Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo::Otorrinolaringoloxía
dc.page.initial4339
dc.page.final4349
dc.relation.projectIDCRUE-CSIC
dc.relation.projectIDUniversidad Internacional de Andalucia
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08094-7
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess*
dc.subject.keywordAS Santiago
dc.subject.keywordCHUS
dc.subject.keywordAS Santiago
dc.subject.keywordCHUS
dc.subject.keywordAS Vigo
dc.subject.keywordCHUVI
dc.typefidesArtículo Científico (incluye Original, Original breve, Revisión Sistemática y Meta-análisis)
dc.typesophosArtículo de Revisión
dc.volume.number280


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)