Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem

dc.contributor.authorReviriego-Rodrigo, E.*
dc.contributor.authorIbargoyen-Roteta, N.*
dc.contributor.authorCarreguí-Vilar, S.*
dc.contributor.authorMediavilla-Serrano, L.*
dc.contributor.authorUceira Rey, Sonia*
dc.contributor.authorIglesias-Casás, S.*
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Casado, A.*
dc.contributor.authorToledo-Chávarri, A.*
dc.contributor.authorAres-Mateos, G.*
dc.contributor.authorMontero-Carcaboso, S.*
dc.contributor.authorCastelló-Zamora, B.*
dc.contributor.authorBurgos-Alonso, N.*
dc.contributor.authorMoreno-Rodríguez, A.*
dc.contributor.authorHernández-Tejada, N.*
dc.contributor.authorKoetsenruyter, C.*
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T11:21:12Z
dc.date.available2025-09-09T11:21:12Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationReviriego-Rodrigo, Ibargoyen-Roteta, Carreguí-Vilar, Mediavilla-Serrano, Uceira-Rey, Iglesias-Casás, et al. Experiences of water immersion during childbirth: a qualitative thematic synthesis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2023;23(1).
dc.identifier.issn1471-2393
dc.identifier.otherhttps://portalcientifico.sergas.gal//documentos/64860112a219857f1d78a053
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11940/21469
dc.description.abstractBackground: The increasing demand for childbirth care based on physiological principles has led official bodies to encourage health centers to provide evidence-based care aimed at promoting women's participation in informed decision-making and avoiding excessive medical intervention during childbirth. One of the goals is to reduce pain and find alternative measures to epidural anesthesia to enhance women's autonomy and well-being during childbirth. Currently, water immersion is used as a non-pharmacological method for pain relief. This review aimed to identify and synthesize evidence on women's and midwives' experiences, values, and preferences regarding water immersion during childbirth. Methods: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence were conducted. Databases were searched and references were checked according to specific criteria. Studies that used qualitative data collection and analysis methods to examine the opinions of women or midwives in the hospital setting were included. Non-qualitative studies, mixed-methods studies that did not separately report qualitative results, and studies in languages other than English or Spanish were excluded. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program Qualitative Research Checklist was used to assess study quality, and results were synthesized using thematic synthesis. Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. The qualitative studies yielded three key themes: 1) reasons identified by women and midwives for choosing a water birth, 2) benefits experienced in water births, and 3) barriers and facilitators of water immersion during childbirth. Conclusions: The evidence from qualitative studies indicates that women report benefits associated with water birth. From the perspective of midwives, ensuring safe water births requires adequate resources, midwives training, and rigorous standardized protocols to ensure that all pregnant women can safely opt for water immersion during childbirth with satisfactory results.
dc.description.sponsorshipNo specific funding has been required to develop this article. The financial support for the activities of the Spanish Network of Agencies for Assessing National Health System Technologies and Performance (RedETS) is provided by the Spanish Ministry of Health.
dc.languageeng
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.meshPregnancy *
dc.subject.meshFemale *
dc.subject.meshHumans *
dc.subject.meshWater *
dc.subject.meshImmersion *
dc.subject.meshParturition *
dc.subject.meshDelivery, Obstetric*
dc.subject.meshMidwifery *
dc.subject.meshQualitative Research *
dc.titleExperiences of water immersion during childbirth: a qualitative thematic synthesis
dc.typeArtigo
dc.authorsophosReviriego-Rodrigo, E.; Ibargoyen-Roteta, N.; Carreguí-Vilar, S.; Mediavilla-Serrano, L.; Uceira-Rey, S.; Iglesias-Casás, S.; Martín-Casado, A.; Toledo-Chávarri, A.; Ares-Mateos, G.; Montero-Carcaboso, S.; Castelló-Zamora, B.; Burgos-Alonso, N.; Moreno-Rodríguez, A.; Hernández-Tejada, N.; Koetsenruyter, C.
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12884-023-05690-7
dc.identifier.sophos64860112a219857f1d78a053
dc.issue.number1
dc.journal.titleBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth*
dc.organizationServizo Galego de Saúde::Áreas Sanitarias (A.S.) - Hospital Público da Barbanza::Obstetricia e xinecoloxía
dc.relation.projectIDSpanish Ministry of Health
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05690-7
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess*
dc.subject.keywordAS Santiago
dc.subject.keywordHP Barbanza
dc.typefidesArtículo Científico (incluye Original, Original breve, Revisión Sistemática y Meta-análisis)
dc.typesophosArtículo Original
dc.volume.number23


Ficheiros no ítem

Este ítem aparece na(s) seguinte(s) colección(s)

Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
A non ser que se indique outra cousa, a licenza do ítem descríbese comoAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)