Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorBengoa Terrero, C.*
dc.contributor.authorBas Villalobos, M.*
dc.contributor.authorPastor Rodríguez-Moñino, A.*
dc.contributor.authorLasheras Carbajo, M.D.*
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Villacastín, J.*
dc.contributor.authorFernández Pérez, Cristina *
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Torrent, M.J.*
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-del-Hoyo, R.*
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Lledó, A.*
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T12:42:59Z
dc.date.available2025-09-09T12:42:59Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationBengoa Terrero C, Bas Villalobos M, Pastor Rodríguez-Moñino A, Lasheras Carbajo MD, Pérez-Villacastín J, Fernández Pérez C, et al. Increasing Influenza Vaccination in Primary Healthcare Workers Using Solidary Incentives: Analysis of Efficacy and Costs. Vaccines. 2023;11(3).
dc.identifier.issn2076-393X
dc.identifier.otherhttps://portalcientifico.sergas.gal//documentos/6444ede948c3090deaa2628d
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11940/21636
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Influenza vaccination campaigns have difficulty in reaching the 75% uptake in healthcare workers (HCWs) that public health organizations target. This study runs a campaign across 42 primary care centers (PCCs) where for every HCW vaccinated against influenza, a polio vaccine is donated through UNICEF for children in developing nations. It also analyses the efficacy and cost of the campaign. Method: This observational prospective non-randomized cohort study was conducted across 262 PCCs and 15.812 HCWs. A total of 42 PCCs were delivered the full campaign, 114 were used as the control group, and 106 were excluded. The vaccine uptake in HCWs within each of those PCCs was registered. The cost analysis assumes that campaign costs remain stable year to year, and the only added cost would be the polio vaccines (0.59?). Results: We found statistically significant differences between both groups. A total of 1423 (59.02%) HCWs got vaccinated in the intervention group and 3768 (55.76%) in the control group OR 1.14, CI 95% (1.04-1.26). In this scenario, each additional HCW vaccinated in the intervention group costs 10.67?. Assuming all 262 PCCs had joined the campaign and reached 59.02% uptake, the cost of running this incentive would have been 5506?. The potential cost of increasing uptake in HCWs by 1% across all PCC (n = 8816) would be 1683?, and across all healthcare providers, 8862? (n = 83.226). Conclusions: This study reveals that influenza vaccination uptake can be innovative by including solidary incentives and be successful in increasing uptake in HCWs. The cost of running a campaign such as this one is low.
dc.languageeng
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleIncreasing Influenza Vaccination in Primary Healthcare Workers Using Solidary Incentives: Analysis of Efficacy and Costs
dc.typeArtigo
dc.authorsophosBengoa Terrero, C.; Bas Villalobos, M.; Pastor Rodríguez-Moñino, A.; Lasheras Carbajo, M.D.; Pérez-Villacastín, J.; Fernández Pérez, C.; García Torrent, M.J.; Sánchez-del-Hoyo, R.; García Lledó, A.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/vaccines11030557
dc.identifier.sophos6444ede948c3090deaa2628d
dc.issue.number3
dc.journal.titleVaccines*
dc.organizationServizo Galego de Saúde::Áreas Sanitarias (A.S.) - Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago::Medicina preventiva
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11030557
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess*
dc.subject.keywordAS Santiago
dc.subject.keywordCHUS
dc.typefidesArtículo Científico (incluye Original, Original breve, Revisión Sistemática y Meta-análisis)
dc.typesophosArtículo Original
dc.volume.number11


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)