PolyDeep Advance 1: Clinical Validation of a Computer-Aided Detection System for Colorectal Polyp Detection with a Second Observer Design
Davila Piñon, Pedro; Pedrido, Teresa; Díez Martín, Astrid Irene; HERRERO RIVAS, JESUS MIGUEL; Puga Gimenez de Azcárate, Manuel; Rivas Moral, Laura; Sánchez Hernández, Eloy; ZARRAQUIÑOS MARTINEZ, SARA; Pin Vieito, noel; Vega Villaamil, Pablo; Soto Iglesias, Santiago; Remedios Espino, David Rafael; DOMINGUEZ CARBAJALES, RUBEN; Fernández Riverola, Florentino; Nogueira Rodríguez, Alba; González Peña, Daniel; Reboiro Jato, Miguel; López Fernández, Hugo; Cubiella Fernández, Joaquín
Identificadores
Identificadores
Visualización o descarga de ficheros
Visualización o descarga de ficheros
Fecha de publicación
2025-02-13Título de revista
Diagnostics
Tipo de contenido
Artigo
DeCS
colonoscopia | Programas de Detección Diagnóstica | pólipos del colonMeSH
Diagnostic Screening Programs | Colonoscopy | Colonic PolypsResumen
[EN] Background: PolyDeep is a computer-aided detection and characterization system that has demonstrated a high diagnostic yield for in vitro detection of colorectal polyps. Our objective is to compare the diagnostic performance of expert endoscopists and PolyDeep for colorectal polyp detection. Methods: PolyDeep Advance 1 (NCT05514301) is an unicentric diagnostic test study with a second observer design. Endoscopists performed colonoscopy blinded to PolyDeep’s detection results. The main endpoint was the sensitivity for colorectal polyp (adenoma, serrated or hyperplastic lesion) detection. The secondary endpoints were the diagnostic performance for diminutive lesions (≤5 mm), neoplasia (adenoma, serrated lesion) and adenoma detection. Results: We included 205 patients (55.1% male, 63.0 ± 6.2 years of age) referred to colonoscopy (positive faecal immunochemical occult blood test = 60.5%, surveillance colonoscopy = 39.5%). We excluded eight patients due to incomplete colonoscopy. Endoscopists detected 384 lesions, of which 39 were not detected by PolyDeep. In contrast, PolyDeep predicted 410 possible additional lesions, 26 of these predictions confirmed by endoscopists as lesions, resulting in a potential 6.8% detection increase with respect to the 384 lesions detected by the endoscopists. In total, 410 lesions were detected, 20 were not retrieved, five were colorectal adenocarcinoma, 343 were colorectal polyps (231 adenomas, 39 serrated and 73 hyperplastic polyps), 42 were normal mucosa and 289 were ≤5 mm. We did not find statistically significant differences between endoscopists and PolyDeep for colorectal polyp detection (Sensitivity = 94.2%, 91.5%, p = 0.2; Specificity = 9.5%, 14.3%, p = 0.7), diminutive lesions (Sensitivity = 92.3%, 89.5%, p = 0.4; Specificity = 9.8%, 14.6%, p = 0.7), neoplasia (Sensitivity = 95.2%, 92.9%, p = 0.3; Specificity = 9.6%, 13.9%, p = 0.4) and adenoma detection (Sensitivity = 94.4%, 92.6%, p = 0.5; Specificity = 7.2%, 11.8%, p = 0.2). Conclusions: Expert endoscopists and PolyDeep have similar diagnostic performance for colorectal polyp detection.
El ítem tiene asociados los siguientes ficheros de licencia:
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional











